AMP33
Network Design & Footprint Strategy
Compare facility, lane, supplier, and customer footprint scenarios from real tenant evidence. AMP33 creates a decision packet and review queue item only; execution remains approval-gated.
Step 1
Baseline
Summarize facilities, inventory pressure, lanes, customers, and suppliers.
Step 2
Scenarios
Compare no-change, rebalance, lane consolidation, and resilience options.
Step 3
Tradeoffs
Show service, cost, risk, and missing-data assumptions.
Step 4
Review
Queue human approval before downstream network work begins.
Facilities
5
Lanes
87
Suppliers
25
Customers
54
Score
65
Scenario
rebalance_constrained_facilities
Service risks
1
Cost risks
2
Live Network Preview
Score 65/100 · allocation 14% · scenarios 4 · missing data 20
Network design score is 65/100 across 5 active facilities, 87 lanes, 54 customer nodes, and 25 supplier nodes. Recommended scenario: Rebalance work away from constrained facilities. Service risks: 1; cost risks: 2; missing data gaps: 20. Packet creation does not mutate facilities, lanes, suppliers, customers, orders, shipments, inventory, RFQs, tariffs, or carrier allocations.
MONITOR
Keep current footprint
0-30 days · cost 0% · service +0% · MEDIUM risk
Baseline review does not mutate facilities, lanes, suppliers, customers, orders, or shipments.
SERVICE_RECOVERY
Rebalance work away from constrained facilities
30-60 days · cost 2% · service +1% · MEDIUM risk
No warehouse, inventory, WMS task, or reservation record changes until a human approves downstream work.
COST_AND_SERVICE
Consolidate fragmented low-volume lanes
45-90 days · cost -6% · service +3% · HIGH risk
No carrier allocation, RFQ, tariff, booking, or shipment route changes are applied automatically.
RESILIENCE
Add supplier-region resilience
60-120 days · cost 4% · service +7% · HIGH risk
No supplier master data, approval status, sourcing award, or PO split is changed without approval.
Network Design Packets
No network design packets yet.